F.R.E.D. Judge Training

★Official courses★

 

F.R.E.D. Certification

Forensics Related Educational Document

Pacific Southwest Collegiate Forensics Association

★ 3 Required Quizzes
★ 80% Passing Score
★ Valid One Year

Welcome, Judges!

Welcome to the Pacific Southwest Collegiate Forensics Association! These guidelines are designed to assist both brand new judges and experienced judges as they familiarize themselves with our organization’s rules, expectations, and judging conventions.

The tournament offers the following training materials to support consistent, fair, and educational judging while ensuring a positive experience for all competitors.

⚠️ Important Requirement:

Judges must complete all 3 required F.R.E.D. training quizzes and earn a score of 80% or better on each quiz.


Required Training Quizzes

Complete all three quizzes below before judging at a PSCFA tournament. Each quiz must be passed with a score of 80% or higher.

⚖️ Debate Events

Complete this training to review Debate Events judging expectations and guidelines.

What does this quiz cover?

This quiz covers PSCFA rules for debate formats, speaker point guidelines, flow judging conventions, and how to complete your ballot accurately.

🟢 Start Debate Course

🌎 Cultural Etiquette

Complete this training to review inclusive and respectful judging practices.

What does this quiz cover?

This quiz covers culturally responsive judging, avoiding bias in feedback, respectful communication with competitors, and inclusive practices during rounds.

🟢 Start Cultural Course

🎤 Individual Events

Complete this training for Individual Events judging procedures and standards.

What does this quiz cover?

This quiz covers PSCFA Individual Events categories, ranking and rating procedures, how to write constructive feedback, and ballot completion for I.E. rounds.

🟢 Start I.E. Course


✅ Completion Standard:

A passing score is 80% or higher on each quiz. Judges should complete all three trainings before judging at PSCFA tournaments.

Pacific Southwest Collegiate Forensics Association

Supporting fair, consistent, and educational forensic competition.

Accessibility Matters: Materials are designed to be accessible. If you encounter any barriers, please message us so we can support you.

Schools

PSCFA Member Schools

We are grateful to all PSCFA member schools for their ongoing support and dedication to student success in forensics. Below is a list of current member institutions.

Want to join PSCFA?

Contact us to learn more about membership.

Colleges & Universities

  • Antelope Valley College — Lancaster, CA
  • Azusa Pacific University
  • Biola University — La Mirada, CA
  • California Baptist University — Riverside, CA
  • California State University, Dominguez Hills — Carson, CA
  • California State University, Fullerton — Fullerton, CA
  • California State University, Los Angeles — Los Angeles, CA
  • California State University, Long Beach — Long Beach, CA
  • California State University, Northridge — Northridge, CA
  • California State University, San Bernardino — San Bernardino, CA
  • Cerritos College — Norwalk, CA
  • Chapman University — Orange, CA
  • College of the Canyons — Santa Clarita, CA
  • Concordia University Irvine — Irvine, CA
  • Copper Mountain College — Joshua Tree, CA
  • Cypress College — Cypress, CA
  • East Los Angeles College — Monterey Park, CA
  • Eastern Michigan University — Ypsilanti, MI
  • El Camino College — Torrance, CA
  • Fullerton College — Fullerton, CA
  • Glendale College (AZ)
  • Glendale Community College (CA) — Glendale, CA
  • Grossmont College — El Cajon, CA
  • Irvine Valley College — Irvine, CA
  • La Sierra University — Riverside, CA
  • Los Angeles City College — Los Angeles, CA
  • Los Angeles Valley College — Valley Glen, CA
  • Moorpark College — Moorpark, CA
  • Mt. San Antonio College — Walnut, CA
  • Orange Coast College — Costa Mesa, CA
  • Pasadena City College — Pasadena, CA
  • Point Loma Nazarene University — San Diego, CA
  • Saddleback College — Mission Viejo, CA
  • San Diego Christian College — San Diego, CA
  • San Diego Mesa College — San Diego, CA
  • San Diego State University — San Diego, CA
  • Santa Monica College — Santa Monica, CA
  • Santa Rosa Junior College — Santa Rosa, CA
  • Santiago Canyon College — Orange, CA
  • Solano Community College — Fairfield, CA
  • UCLA — Los Angeles, CA
  • University of California, Irvine — Irvine, CA
  • Vanguard University — Costa Mesa, CA
  • Whittier College — Whittier, CA

Is your school not on the list?
We’d love to have you join the PSCFA community.


Contact Us to Join PSCFA

Videos

🎥 Share Your Videos!

We’re building a collection of updated videos to showcase student performances in speech and debate — and we need your help!

If you have a video of your students (with proper consent), we’d love for you to share it with us. These videos are valuable teaching tools for students and help the public better understand what forensics (speech & debate) is all about.

To contribute:
  • 📤 Upload your video to YouTube.
  • 🔗 Share the link with us so we can feature it here.

You can send the link directly to the secretary or submit it via the Contact Page.

Thank you for supporting our learning community!

Archives

Impromptu | Extemp | Informative | Persuasive | ADS/STE | CA | NFA-LD | British Parliamentary | IPDA | Poetry | Prose | Drama | Duo | POI

Resources for Online Tournaments 

Impromptu

Back to top

Extemporaneous

Back to top

Informative

Back to top

Persuasive

Back to top

ADS/STE

Back to top

CA

Back to top

NFA-LD

Back to top

British Parliamentary

International Public Debate Association

Poetry
Please contact the PSCFA executive secretary for information about interp videos.
Back to top

Prose
Please contact the PSCFA executive secretary for information about interp videos.
Back to top

Dramatic Interp
Please contact the PSCFA executive secretary for information about interp videos.
Back to top

Duo Interp
Please contact the PSCFA executive secretary for information about interp videos.
Back to top

Program Oral Interp
Please contact the PSCFA executive secretary for information about interp videos.
Back to top

Mailing Address for Payments

PSCFA Financial Information

This page contains important financial policies, contact information, and procedures for PSCFA member schools. Please review all sections carefully and update your college’s records as needed.

Mailing Address for Payments

PSCFA now has a dedicated mailing address. Please update your college’s business services records accordingly.
Do not send checks to Das’s or Nick’s college addresses.

All checks should be mailed to:

Nicholas Matthews, Treasurer
Pacific Southwest Collegiate Forensics Association
PO Box 65
Garden Grove, CA 92842

For PSCFA-related financial inquiries, please email Nick directly:

Email Nick Matthews at nmatthews.pscfa@gmail.com

Please avoid using his Cerritos College email for PSCFA business.

PSCFA W-9 Form (2025–2026)

Your institution may need a W-9 form to process payments to PSCFA as a vendor. To request an updated W-9 form, please contact Nick:

Email Nick Matthews at nmatthews.pscfa@gmail.com

Outstanding Balances
  • For tournament balances from the 2025–2026 academic year, please contact Nick Matthews.
  • For balances prior to 2025–2026, please contact Das Nugent-Odasso, who is responsible for closing out legacy accounts.

⚠️ Important Reminder:

As outlined in the PSCFA bylaws, the Treasurer is authorized to drop entries from schools with unpaid balances. This policy will be actively enforced starting in 2025–2026 due to significant past delinquencies.

If your school does not pay its balance for a tournament, your entries for the next tournament will be dropped. If extenuating circumstances delay your payment, you must contact Nick before the entry deadline to discuss your situation.

Invoice Collection Policy

Each school is responsible for collecting its invoice from Nick before awards on the final day of each PSCFA tournament. It is not the Treasurer’s responsibility to locate team representatives.

Please assign a reliable individual — ideally a coach — to collect your school’s invoice at every tournament.

Fall 2025 Policy Update

To encourage timely invoice pickup, PSCFA passed the following provisions:

  • Late Fee: A $50 fee will be added if a school fails to collect its invoice on time. This fee may be waived only once per academic year.
  • Ballot Withholding: If an invoice is not picked up, your school’s ballots will be withheld. To receive them, you must contact Nick to request your invoice and clarify your plan to submit payment.


⬆ Back to Top

Accessibility Matters: Materials are designed to be accessible. If you encounter any barriers, please message us so we can support you.

F.R.E.D.

📚 F.R.E.D.

Forensics Related Educational Document

PSCFA Judging Guidelines

 

Welcome to the Pacific Southwest Collegiate Forensic Association! These guidelines help both new and experienced judges understand our organization’s rules and conventions. The suggestions below are designed to support your judging and ensure a positive educational experience for all competitors.

Jump to a Section:


New FRED Course and Certification

We have a new FRED course and certification. Certification is good for one year beginning on August 25, 2025. For example, if you earn your certification on February 17, 2026, it expires on August 24, 2026.

Action Required: Please ensure all of your judges have completed the course, passed all quizzes, and are certified prior to judging at all PSCFA Tournaments.

Access the FRED Certification Course


Being the Judge

Please bring a laptop, tablet, or phone. An online ballot system is used for all PSCFA tournaments. Make sure your phone number and email are correct in FTN before arriving. Contact the Director of Forensics for the team you are judging if you are unsure.

Critical Action:

Check your email and text messages for a ballot notification. Accept your ballot as soon as possible. If you fail to accept in time, the ballot may be reassigned and your school will incur fees for a missed ballot.

Judge Demeanor

As the judge, be a supportive audience member. Present a positive and attentive attitude to each speaker, and use respectful language when referring to students on ballots.

Turn Off Phones

Turn off all cell phones and pagers before the round begins — do not set them to vibrate. Remind all students to do the same.


What to Bring

  • Stopwatch: To time speeches. A timer is also available on the ballot, but it does not automatically record times — you must type the speech time into the designated area.
  • Computer, Tablet, or Phone with Internet Access: You will access your ballots online. Make sure you are receiving emails from FTN before the day of the tournament.
  • Pad of Paper: To take notes during debate rounds.

Getting Started

Individual Events: Start on Time

Start the round as close to the designated time as possible. Do not wait for every student — some may be entered in more than one event per round.

Debate: Start on Time

For Lincoln Douglas and International Public Debate, both debaters must be present before the debate can begin. For Parliamentary and Policy Debate, both teams must be complete before the round starts.

Attendance

Your ballot will list the speaking order. Students should sign in by writing their names on the board or a sheet of paper. Students perform in the designated order unless there is a double entry — that speaker is given order priority.

Double Entry

Students competing in two events during the same round will mark DE or XE next to their name. They will either perform and leave early, or arrive late after competing elsewhere. Students double-entered in extemporaneous speaking may be very late. Do not penalize double-entered students for arriving late or leaving early.

No Show

A judge may call a “No-Show” once the designated round time has passed. If the student signed in as Double Entered (D.E.), wait to confirm they have not returned before leaving. Write “No Show” on the ballot.


During the Round

Timing the Speakers

All events must be timed and recorded on the ballot. See each event description for specific time limits and whether verbal or visual time signals are required.


Ballots

Filling Out the Ballot

Your ballot will include the room number, student names, student codes, school name or code, preferred pronouns, accommodations, and double-entry status. Take roll before the round begins to verify students are in the correct room.

Note on Double-Entered Students: Do not mark double-entered students as “no show” or penalize them for arriving late or leaving early. They are competing in two events simultaneously.

Comments

Ballots are an educational tool. Write comments during and briefly after each speech. Submit your ballot as soon as you have decided rankings and rates. You may return to add comments before the tournament ends.

Ranking the Round

Rank each competitor from 1st to 5th after each preliminary round (1 = best). Give a tie rank of 5th to all students beyond the top four, unless instructed otherwise by the Tournament Director.

Reason for Decision

Explain why a student received their ranking. For example: if a student is ranked 3rd out of six, what about their performance placed them third? Students rely on your feedback to improve.

Returning the Ballots

Submit your ballot immediately after making your decision. When submitted successfully, confetti will appear on your screen. If you do not see confetti, your ballot has not been submitted. You may add additional comments before the tournament ends.


Judges Criteria

Criteria

The weight of performing over-time, being a poor audience member, arriving late, literary merit, topic selection, social significance, and any situation not expressly covered in these guidelines is left to your discretion as the judge.

Objectivity

Judge each round as fairly as possible. Keep an open mind, avoid bias based on personal affiliations, and be mindful of how your written comments will affect the students reading them.


Responsibilities of Judges

  1. Arrive at least 15 minutes before each round. Accept your ballot as soon as you receive it. Do not leave the area until all ballots are accepted and “Stand-by” judges are released.
  2. Submit completed ballots promptly after the round. You may add comments after submitting rates and ranks — before the tournament ends.
  3. Do not provide oral critiques in non-debate events before submitting your ballot.
  4. Provide accurate time signals in all limited preparation events and debate.
  5. Provide detailed and constructive written criticism for every round you evaluate.
  6. Render an unambiguous win/loss decision in each debate round, and unambiguous points and rank in each preliminary round.
  7. You may disclose decisions and provide oral critiques in debate if it does not impact the schedule and it is not a final round. Final round winners are disclosed at the awards ceremony. Submit your ballot first.
  8. The Tournament Director has discretion to remove a judge from a round based on potential conflict of interest.

Potentially Unfamiliar Attributes of PSCFA Tournaments

Impromptu

Students choose one of three topics or quotations for their speech. Students are expected to watch the entire round unless double-entered — they do not wait in the hall.

Parliamentary Debate

Students may consult written materials during preparation time but may not read from those materials during the debate. Two students may engage in group preparation during prep time.

Festival Finals

In events with 24 or more contestants, the tournament typically uses festival finals — simultaneous “finals” rounds — instead of semifinals. In all final rounds, judges rank to 5th place and tie remaining speakers at 5th.


Back to Top

Limited Preparation Events

General Description: Limited Preparation events are speeches students prepare at the tournament. Students give a different speech each round.

Extemporaneous Speaking (Extemp)

Students are given a current events topic and have 30 minutes to prepare a 7-minute speech. Topics are drawn from political, economic, and international affairs from the 90 days prior to the tournament. Schools provide their own research materials. Students select one topic from three choices and may use notes.

Handing out topics is not the judge’s responsibility. Students arrive one at a time in speaking order. The judge must give each speaker time signals throughout their speech.

Impromptu Speaking (IMP)

Each contestant receives 3 topic slips drawn from quotations, slogans, and similar prompts. A total of 7 minutes is allowed to read the topic, prepare, and speak. No outside notes are permitted beyond what the student writes on the topic slip or note card during preparation.

Handing out topics and supervising preparation time are the responsibility of the judge. Ensure no student sees topics before their turn. Each student receives a different topic. The ballot table will typically provide a labeled set of topics for each speaker.

Begin timing once the speaker has read their topic. Give time signals aloud before they begin, then by hand during the speech. Students must remain in the round as audience members unless double-entered.


Platform Speaking Events

Time Limit: 10 Minutes Maximum — No Minimum

General Description: Platform events are original speeches prepared before the tournament. Delivery may be from memory, extemporaneous, or manuscript. Judges should NOT give time signals. Audio/visual aids are allowed but not required. Set-up time is not counted in the speech time but should be minimal.

Speech to Entertain (STE) / After Dinner Speaking (ADS)

Students deliver a speech to entertain an audience. It may be persuasive or informative in nature — it should be more than a series of jokes or a stand-up routine.

Communication Analysis (CA)

Students analyze a spoken or communication event by applying principles of rhetorical and/or communication theory to contribute to a better understanding of that event.

Informative (INF) / Expository Speaking

The purpose is to describe, clarify, explain, and/or define an object, idea, concept, or process.

Persuasive Speaking / Persuasion (PERS)

A speech designed to inspire, reinforce, or change the beliefs, attitudes, values, or actions of the audience.


Multicultural Event

Cultural Artifact (Cult Art)

Time Limit: 5 Minutes — No time signals given by judge

This speech examines, explains, or analyzes an artifact of a culture, co-culture, or counter-culture. The presentation must include a representation of the artifact (visual, audio, etc.). Delivery may be from memory, extemporaneously, or manuscript.


Oral Interpretation Events

Time Limit: 10 Minutes Maximum — No Minimum — Judges do NOT give time signals

General Description: Oral Interpretation involves presenting literature and original remarks to orient the audience to its meaning, show its significance, or link selections together around a theme.

General Rules

  1. Students must appear to present from the printed page — selections should not seem memorized. Introductions and transitions are delivered in an apparently extemporaneous manner.
  2. Presentations may include one or more selections of literature.
  3. Students may present portions or “cuttings” from works rather than complete works.
  4. Contestants may not add or reassign scenes or lines to the cutting. Adding an occasional line when a character has been deleted is discouraged.
  5. Contestants may not rewrite the ending of a work.
  6. Contestants may not change the point of view or gender of a character.
  7. Contestants may not perform a text in a genre for which it was not written.

Event Descriptions

Dramatic Interpretation (DI)

A selection or selections of dramatic material (for example: plays, screenplays, radio dramas).

Prose Interpretation (PRO)

A selection or selections of prose (for example: short stories, novels, essays).

Poetry Interpretation (POE)

A selection or selections of poetic material (for example: poetry, lyrics).

Program Oral Interpretation (POI)

A program of thematically linked selections from two of the three recognized genres (prose, drama, poetry). A contestant may use works from one or more authors.

Dramatic Duo Interpretation (DUO)

A cutting from a play involving two or more characters performed by two individuals. Material may be from stage, screen, or radio. Focus should be off-stage — not directed at each other.


Readers Theater / Interpreters Theater

Time Limit: 25 Minutes — Includes set-up, performance, and take-down

  1. Readers Theater is a group oral interpretation event involving three or more readers. Through vivid vocal and physical expression, the group causes the audience to experience the literature as a living event — for both readers and audience. Original student work is encouraged.
  2. Students should interpret from the printed page — the audience should perceive the presentation as interpretation, not recitation or memorization.
  3. Presentations should consist of: (1) a thematic collage of varied literary selections from one or more authors, or (2) a cutting or adaptation from a single piece of prose, poetry, or drama.
  4. Ensemble, dress, and music may be used as suggestive accouterments; however, extra-literary devices should not dominate the presentation.
  5. Time limit is 25 minutes, including set-up, performance, and take-down.
  6. Students may not be double-entered in Readers Theater.

Back to Top

Debate Events


International Public Debate (IPDA)

  1. Topics are announced in-round with 5 topics (2 value, 2 policy, 1 metaphor) for strikes. Negative strikes first; turns are taken until one topic remains.
  2. Debaters may not consult others during prep time. Paper and/or electronic research materials are allowed and may be quoted or paraphrased — but not read directly. Extemporaneous delivery is required per IPDA rules.

Scroll left or right to view the full table on small screens.

IPDA Speech Order and Time Limits
Speech Time Limit
Affirmative Constructive 5 min
Cross-Examination 2 min
Negative Constructive 6 min
Cross-Examination 2 min
First Affirmative Rebuttal 3 min
First Negative Rebuttal 5 min
Second Affirmative Rebuttal 3 min

Lincoln Douglas Debate (LD)

  1. One-on-one debate following the same rules as policy debate, with different speaking times.

Scroll left or right to view the full table on small screens.

Lincoln Douglas Debate Speech Order and Time Limits
Speech Time Limit
Affirmative Constructive 6 min
Cross-Examination 3 min
Negative Constructive 7 min
Cross-Examination 3 min
Affirmative Rebuttal 6 min
Negative Rebuttal 6 min
Affirmative Rebuttal 3 min
  1. Each speaker is allowed 4 minutes total prep time for the round. The judge must track each side’s time.
  2. When asked to provide evidence, the debater must supply a legible paper copy including the full paragraph context — no ellipses. Font must be at least 12pt or legible handprint. Evidence must be returned by the end of the round.
  3. Debaters are prohibited from conducting online research during the round.
  4. After the round, assign ranks and up to 30 speaker points per speaker. Points below 15 should be extremely rare. Ties in points are NOT permitted. The speaker ranked 1st should receive the most points. A “low point win” should be noted on the ballot if applicable.

Parliamentary Debate (PARLI)

  1. The judge decides which team better upholds or disproves the resolution.
  2. If three topics are provided, the government team strikes one, then the opposition strikes one. The remaining topic is debated. The judge — also called the “Speaker of the House” — distributes topics and starts timing when the topic is decided. Both teams have 15 minutes to prepare. One team may prepare in the room; the government team has priority.
  3. If one topic is announced centrally, that announcement begins prep time.
  4. Students may ask for your judging philosophy. Explain your debate background so speakers can adapt to your expertise level.
  5. Students may not be double-entered in Parliamentary Debate.
  6. PSCFA does not allow group preparation or internet use. The tournament does not guarantee internet access.
  7. After prep time, confirm which student fills each role: Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, Member of Government, Member of Opposition. Record names and team names on the ballot.
  8. Give each speaker time signals throughout their speech. Speech order and time limits:

Scroll left or right to view the full table on small screens.

Parliamentary Debate Speech Order and Time Limits
Speech Time Limit
Prime Minister’s Constructive 7 min
Leader of Opposition’s Constructive 8 min
Member of Government’s Constructive 8 min
Member of Opposition’s Constructive 8 min
Leader of Opposition’s Rebuttal 4 min
Prime Minister’s Rebuttal 5 min
  1. Write comments during and after the debate. Time is of the essence.
  2. Students may raise a “point of information” during constructive speeches — only after the first minute and before the last minute. Knock once on the desk to signal one minute elapsed or remaining.
  3. Students may raise a “point of order” to ask the judge to rule on a procedural issue. Stop timing, hear both sides, then accept, reject, or take it under consideration.
  4. After the round, assign ranks and up to 30 speaker points per speaker. Points below 15 should be extremely rare. Ties in points are NOT permitted. A “low point win” should be noted on the ballot if applicable.

Policy Debate (PD)

  1. Students debate the same topic all year. Ask the ballot table for the current year’s topic.
  2. Students arrive prepared to debate.
  3. Students may ask for your judging philosophy. Explain your debate background so they can adapt to your expertise.
  4. Evidence and prepared materials are allowed and encouraged.
  5. The affirmative team speaks first; the negative team speaks second.
  6. The round consists of 8 speeches — 4 constructives followed by 4 rebuttals:

Scroll left or right to view the full table on small screens.

Policy Debate Speech Order and Time Limits
Speech Time Limit
Affirmative Constructive 9 min
Cross-Examination 3 min
Negative Constructive 9 min
Cross-Examination 3 min
Affirmative Constructive 9 min
Cross-Examination 3 min
Negative Constructive 9 min
Cross-Examination 3 min
Negative Rebuttal 6 min
Affirmative Rebuttal 6 min
Negative Rebuttal 6 min
Affirmative Rebuttal 6 min
  1. Each team is allowed 10 minutes total prep time. The judge must track time used by each side.
  2. After the round, assign ranks and up to 30 speaker points per speaker. Points below 15 should be extremely rare. Ties in points are permitted in Policy Debate. The speaker ranked 1st should receive the most points. A “low point win” should be noted on the ballot if applicable.
  3. You may give oral critiques if time permits, but vacate the room promptly so the next round can prepare.

Back to Top

Accessibility Matters: Materials are designed to be accessible. If you encounter any barriers, please message us so we can support you.

PSCFA Documents

PSCFA Documents

Notice of Change in Banking Relationship

NFA- LD Novice Evidence Folder Link 2022-2023

2023 PSCFA Constitution and Bylaws

RULES AND PROCEDURES OF THE (9_2024)

Timeline For Executive Committee Members

PSCFA Committees

PSCFA Hosting List

Agendas & Minutes

2025

2025 Coaches Conference Minutes

2024

2024 Coaches Conference Minutes

2024 PSCFA Cool-Off Meeting Minutes

2023

2023 Coaches Conference Minutes

2023 PSCFA Cool Off Coaches Minutes

2022

2022 Coaches Conference Minutes

2022 PSCFA Cool-Off Minutes

2021

2021 PSCFA Coaches Conference Minutes

2020

PSCFA Coaches Conference Minutes 2020

2019

PSCFA Coaches Conference Minutes 2019

2018

2018 Coaches Conference Final Minutes

2018 Cool-Off Minutes

2017

2017 Coaches Conference Minutes

2017 PSCFA Cool Off Minutes

2016

2016 PSCFA Coaches Conference Minutes

2016 PSCFA Cool-Off Minutes

2015

2015 Coaches Conference Minutes

2015 PSCFA Cool-Off Minutes

2014

2014 Coaches Conference Minutes

2013

2013 Coaches Conference Minutes

2013 PSCFA Spring Meeting Minutes

2012

2012 Coaches Conference Minutes

2011

2011 Coaches Conference proposals

2011 PSCFA Coaches Conference minutes

Back to top

Glossary of Forensics Terms 

Forensics Glossary

A Quick Reference Guide for Coaches, Competitors, and Judges

These terms cover speech and debate generally and are the most commonly used at tournaments. For more detailed or specialized terminology, please consult a textbook focused on specific areas of forensics.

Debate Terms
AC — Affirmative Case
Normally the first speech in a debate.
Aff — Affirmative
The side of the debate that supports the resolution.
AR — Affirmative Rebuttal
One of the types of speeches in a debate. Often combined with a number — for example, “See the 1AR” designates the first affirmative rebuttal.
DA — Disadvantage
A fundamental piece of many negative strategies in policy debate. Argues that the affirmative’s plan will lead to some sort of unwanted outcome.
D-Rule — Decision Rule
Used in some forms of debate to allow the judge to decide who won the round.
Flow
Short for flowsheet — the note-taking device used by judges and competitors in many formats of debate.
K — Kritik
A kind of argument used in multiple forms of debate. Argues that some larger issue than what has already been presented is a better focus of the debate.
Neg — Negative
The side of the debate that does not support the resolution.
NC — Negative Constructive
One of the types of speeches in a debate. Often combined with a number — for example, “See the 1NC” designates the first negative constructive.
NR — Negative Rebuttal
One of the types of speeches in a debate. Often combined with a number — for example, “See the 1NR” designates the first negative rebuttal.
RFD — Reason for Decision
An explanation by a judge (either verbally or on a ballot) as to why they made the decision they did in the round.


⬆ Back to Top

Debate Formats & Speaker Roles

Lincoln-Douglas Debate (LD)

LD — Lincoln-Douglas Debate
Unlike the high school context, LD in college normally refers to the specific event also called “NFA L/D” — a one-on-one policy debate on a yearlong topic governed by the National Forensics Association.

Parliamentary Debate (Parli)

Parli — Parliamentary Debate
A shortened term for parliamentary debate, one of the formats of collegiate debate.
PM — Prime Minister
One of the speaker roles in parliamentary debate.
PMC — Prime Minister Constructive
One of the speeches in a parliamentary debate.
PMR — Prime Minister Rebuttal
One of the speeches in a parliamentary debate.
LO — Leader of Opposition
One of the speaker roles in parliamentary debate.
LOC — Leader of Opposition Constructive
One of the speeches in a parliamentary debate.
LOR — Leader of Opposition Rebuttal
One of the speeches in a parliamentary debate.
POI — Point of Information
In a debate context, this occurs when one debater asks another debater from the opposing team a question during a speech. Note: POI also has a separate meaning in Individual Events — see the IE section below.

IPDA — International Public Debate Association

IPDA
The International Public Debate Association — an organization for a specific form of evidence-less debate that calls for conversational delivery in front of a lay judge. Also refers to the national tournament run by IPDA.


⬆ Back to Top

Organizations & Tournaments
AFA — American Forensics Association
An organization. Also used as shorthand for the “AFA NIET” — the National Individual Event Tournament run by AFA each year.
CEDA — Cross-Examination Debate Association
An organization. Also shorthand for the CEDA National Championship tournament, which uses team evidence debate on a yearlong topic.
NDT — National Debate Tournament
An organization. Also shorthand for that organization’s national tournament, which uses team evidence debate on a yearlong topic.
NFA — National Forensics Association
An organization. Also shorthand for that organization’s national tournament, which includes both speech and debate events.
NPDA — National Parliamentary Debate Association
An organization. Also used as a synonym for parliamentary debate, and as shorthand for the NPDA National Tournament, which includes parliamentary debate.
NPTE — National Parliamentary Tournament of Excellence
A tournament for the top parliamentary debate teams in the country.
PKD — Pi Kappa Delta
A national forensics honor society. Also shorthand for the PKD National Tournament and Conference (also called the National Comprehensive Tournament), which includes nearly all forms of forensics competition.


⬆ Back to Top

Individual Events (IEs)
IE — Individual Events
A synonym for speech events; does not include debate events. Note: Duo Interpretation is typically considered an IE even though two people participate, while Lincoln-Douglas Debate is typically not considered an IE even though one student represents each team.
Interp — Interpretation Event
One genre of individual events.
Intro — Introduction
A short portion of an interpretation event that introduces the principal themes and title of the piece being performed. Also refers to the opening section of a platform or limited prep speech that gains the audience’s attention, states the central idea, and previews the main points.
Teaser
The first section of an interpretation event, meant to engage interest in the performance. Often followed by an introduction and then the rest of the performance.
Drama — Dramatic Interpretation
Unlike high school forensics, in the collegiate context this normally means any interp derived from literature in script format. It does not mean an interp that is sad or tragic.
POI — Programmed Oral Interpretation
In forensics generally, an event that mixes literature from poetry, prose, and drama sources into one thematic program. Note: POI also refers to “Point of Information” in parliamentary debate — see the Debate Formats section above.
STE — Speech to Entertain
A platform event. Also known as After-Dinner Speaking (ADS).
ADS — After-Dinner Speech
A platform speech also known as Speech to Entertain (STE).
Extemp — Extemporaneous Speaking
One of the limited preparation events. Allows 30 minutes of preparation for a 7-minute speech.
Lit — Literature
Used by judges to discuss the relative merits of the literature chosen by a performer in interpretation events.
Black Book
A specific style of 5.5″ × 8.5″ × 1″ black binder often used by performers in interpretation events.
VA — Visual Aid
Used especially in platform events to help explain concepts that would be difficult to follow verbally, or to enhance a speech in some way.


⬆ Back to Top

Tournament Terms
Break
To qualify for an elimination round. The best scores in preliminary rounds are normally used to determine who “breaks” to final rounds.
Finals
The last rounds of any event, for which qualification in preliminary rounds is normally required. All or some competitors in finals receive awards at the closing ceremony of many tournaments.
Cume — Cumulative
A common phrase at award ceremonies: “It took a cume of 6 to break in impromptu” means that students whose total rankings across all preliminary rounds summed to six or less were scheduled into final rounds.
Prelim — Preliminary Round
The rankings in preliminary rounds generally serve to qualify students for final rounds.
Postings
The physical (paper) or virtual (website) listing of rounds, including location, competitors’ names, and speaking order. Also serves as the central hub for all tournament activities.
Tab Room — Tabulation Room
Where all ballots from the tournament are either physically delivered for computer entry, or where tournament administrators monitor the online entry of ballots.
Warm Room
A section of some debate tournaments where team records are displayed and judges can be asked for feedback on rounds. Generally kept separate from postings so teams who do not want to know their record can avoid it.


⬆ Back to Top

Rules and Procedures

The official PSCFA rules and procedures document is available for download below. Please review it before participating in or administering a tournament.



Download PSCFA Rules and Procedures — September 2024 (Word Document)


⬆ Back to Top

Help Us Improve This Glossary

Is there a term a new coach or competitor should know that isn’t listed here?